COMPARATIVE STUDY OF AXIAL BEARING CAPACITY FOR PILE FOUNDATION BASED ON EMPIRICAL, NUMERICAL METHOD AND PILE DRIVING ANALYZER TEST

Main Article Content

Tsaana Khoirunisaa
https://orcid.org/0009-0002-1122-1573
Bambang Setiawan
Yusep M. Purwana

Abstract

Axial bearing capacity is an important factor in designing of foundation. It must be able to carry the load of upper structure without any significant deformation due to important role in pile design. A part from empirical and numerical methods, axial pile bearing capacity can be predicted by pile driving analyzer test that use wave equation analysis during the test. Prediction of the axial bearing capacity and its distribution can be achieved by combining wave equation analysis with dynamic pile monitoring. This paper compares the axial capacity of pile obtained from PDA records with predicted axial capacities obtained using empirical, numerical, and interpretation of static load test method. The empirical method used NSPT data from bore testing that conduct in site, finite element method that uses in this study is Plaxis 8.6. Both of them was compared with PDA test result of axial bearing capacity. There is a difference value of the calculation results of axial pile bearing capacity and foundation settlement. Comparing with PDA, from empirical method has smallest deviation for axial bearing capacity which equal to -268.45 kN with percentage -6.05%, smallest settlement equal to 0,0044 m. Plaxis result shows that distinction between Qult result equal to -11.00 kN with percentage -0.24% and settlement of foundation equal to 0,005 m. From interpretation of static loading test method smallest deviation for Qult which equal to -40,00 kN, with percentage -0,90%, and smallest settlement equal to 0,0055 m. So, from all method the smallest deviation for Qult and PDA result is used finite element method. This is due to many data parameters has been inputted and analyzed in the Plaxis program, so the results of calculation analysis are more detailed and closer to the situation in the research site. Differences in axial bearing capacity can be caused by the test was carried out which depends on the accuracy of operator and parameters that used in the calculations.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Article Details

How to Cite
Khoirunisaa, T., Setiawan, B., & Purwana, Y. M. (2023). COMPARATIVE STUDY OF AXIAL BEARING CAPACITY FOR PILE FOUNDATION BASED ON EMPIRICAL, NUMERICAL METHOD AND PILE DRIVING ANALYZER TEST . International Journal for Computational Civil and Structural Engineering, 19(4), 196–207. https://doi.org/10.22337/2587-9618-2023-19-4-196-207
Section
Articles

References

M. Budhu, Soil Mechanics and Foundations Engineering, 3rd ed. Hoboken: John Wiley & Sons, Inc, 2011.

W. F. Chen and L. Duan, Bridge Engineering Handbook Substructure Design, 2nd Editio. CRC Press, 1999. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1201/9781420049596

G.H. Sara, C. J. Reza, and E. Abolfazl, “Reliability based assessment of axial pile bearing capacity: static analysis, SPT and CPT-based methods”, Georisk: Assessment and Management of Risk for Engineered Systems and Geohazards, vol. 14, issue 3, 2020. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/17499518.2019.1628281

E. Momeni, H. Maizir, N. Gofar, and R. Nazir, “Comparative study on prediction of axial bearing capacity of driven piles in granular materials”, Jurnal Teknologi (Sciences and Engineering), 61(3) 15-20, 2013. DOI: https://doi.org/10.11113/jt.v61.1777

R. A. Mangushev, “Analytical and Field Evaluation Methods of The Bearing Capacity of Deep Piles and Barrettes in Soft Soil at St. Peterburg,” Architecture and Engineering, vol. 1, no. 1, pp. 54–59, 2016, doi: 10.23968/2500-0055-2016-1-1-54-59. DOI: https://doi.org/10.23968/2500-0055-2016-1-1-54-59

S. Henrina, E. Bahsan, and T. Ilyas, “Comparison of direct SPT method for calculating axial capacity of piles in Jakarta Area Comparison of direct SPT method for calculating axial capacity of piles in Jakarta Area,” 2019, doi: 10.1088/1757-899X/673/1/012027. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1088/1757-899X/673/1/012027

E. Anamali, N. Shkodrani, and L. Dhimitri, “Axial Load Capacity of Cast in Place Piles from SPT and CPTU Data,” no. May, pp. 100–108, 2014. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4236/wjet.2014.22011

R. Gohil, and C. Parthasarathy, “Intelligent Assessment of Axial Capacity of Pipe Piles Using High Strain Dynamic Pile Load Tests in Offshore Environment”, Lecture Notes in in Civil Engineering, 2023, 296 271-287. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-19-6513-5_24

S. Thounaojam, and ParbinSultana, “Prediction of bearing capacity of bored cast- in situ pile”, IOSR Journal of Mechanical and Civil Engineering (IOSR-JMCE), vol.1, no.6, 2015.

V. Ghiasi, and S. Eskandari, “Comparing a single pile's axial bearing capacity using numerical modeling and analytical techniques”, Results in Engineering, 17, March, 100893, 2023. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rineng.2023.100893

A. Al-Dawoodi, F. Rahil, and M. Waheed, “Numerical Simulation of Shallow Foundation Behavior Rested on Sandy Soil”, IOP Conference Series: Earth and Environmental Science, 2021, 856(1). DOI: https://doi.org/10.1088/1755-1315/856/1/012042

H. Maizir, and R. Suryanita, “Evaluation of axial pile bearing capacity based on pile driving analyzer (PDA) test using Neural Network”, IOP Conference Series: Earth and Environmental Science, 2018, 106(1). DOI: https://doi.org/10.1088/1755-1315/106/1/012037

W. Deng, X. Ding, and Y. Peng, “A study of vertical bearing capacity of expansive concrete pile in coral sand foundation”, Yantu Lixue /Rock and Soil Mechanics, 41(8), 2814-2820, 2020.

Similar Articles

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 > >> 

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.