RATING THE LIMITING SHIFT OF A STORY AS A CRITERIA FOR A SPECIAL LIMITING STATE
Main Article Content
Abstract
The article presents a verification of one of the existing seismic resistance criteria found in domestic and international standards. The study examines the limit value of relative displacement of the first-floor column in a reinforced concrete building under seismic loading using two different material models in a nonlinear dynamic framework. The article introduces a modeling approach that allows for the assessment of the seismic resistance of reinforced concrete buildings and structures in a nonlinear dynamic framework. The objective of the work is to verify the standardized limit drift value for a specific structural scheme when modeling the column with volumetric elements including direct reinforcement.
Two different material models, implemented in the LS-DYNA software, were used in the column modeling. The first material model is the Karagozian & Case (K&C) Concrete model. This material model represents a three-invariant model with multiple strength and yield surfaces. The model's input parameters include various factors, including empirical ones, such as yield strength, ultimate strength, and residual strength, which are key parameters for the damage accumulation function. The second material model is the Continuous Surface Cap Model, represented by a closed surface (a cap model with a continuous yield surface). This model also accounts for damage accumulation and the degradation of stiffness and strength under cyclic loading.
The results include isocontours of the damage accumulation function in concrete, isocontours of strain and stress intensities in concrete and reinforcement at various time steps, as well as graphs of the damage accumulation functions. The findings confirm the accuracy of the numerically determined limit displacement value and identify which material model most precisely represents the failure mechanisms of concrete, thus indicating its suitability for further in-depth research.
Downloads
Article Details
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
References
NEHRP recommended provisions for seismic regulations For new buildings and other structures (2004) Building Seismic Safety Council for the Federal Emergency Management Agen-cy.
Mkrtychev O.V., Lokhova E.M. (2024) Proektirovanie sejsmostojkih zdanij. Normy novogo pokoleniya [Design of earthquake-resistant buildings. New generation standards]. Zhilishchnoe Stroitel'stvo [Housing Construc-tion]. 2023. No. 4, pp. 42–46. DOI: https://doi.org/10.31659/0044-4472-2024-4-42-46.
Dorozhinsky V.B. (2022) Nelinejnye metody raschetov pri provedenii nauchno-tekhnicheskogo soprovozhdeniya [Nonlinear calculation methods for scientific and technical support] Promyshlennoe i grazhdanskoe stroitel’stvo. No. 10, pp. 32–36 https://doi.org/10.33622/0869-7019.2022.10.32-36.
Jun Wu, Liang Li, Xiuli Du and Xuemei Liu (2017) Numerical Study on the Asphalt Concrete Structurefor Blast and Impact Load Using the Karagozian and Case Concrete Mod-el, Advanced Asphalt Materials and Paving Technologies, vol. 7, no. 202.
Malvar L. J., Crawford J. E., Wesevich, J. W., and Simons, D. (1997) A plasticity con-crete material model for DYNA3D. Int. J. Impact, 19(9–10), pp. 847–873.
Youcai Wu and John E. Crawford (2015) Numerical modeling of concrete using a partially associative plasticity model, American Society of Civil Engineers, vol.141, no.12. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)EM.1943-7889.0000952
Nemecek J., Padevet P., Bittnar Z. Effect of stirrups on behavior of normal and high strength concrete columns]. Acta Polytechnica, 2004, vol. 44(5-6), pp. 158-164.
Murray Y.D. Users manual for LS-DYNA. Concrete material model 159-HRT-05-062. 2007. 77 p.