ЧИСЛЕННОЕ МОДЕЛИРОВАНИЕ МОНОЛИТНЫХ ЖЕЛЕЗОБЕТОННЫХ ПЕРЕКРЫТИЙ С ПУСТОТООБРАЗОВАТЕЛЯМИ, ПРИМЕНЯЕМЫХ В СЕЙСМИЧЕСКИ АКТИВНЫХ РАЙОНАХ
ЧИСЛЕННОЕ МОДЕЛИРОВАНИЕ МОНОЛИТНЫХ ЖЕЛЕЗОБЕТОННЫХ ПЕРЕКРЫТИЙ С ПУСТОТООБРАЗОВАТЕЛЯМИ, ПРИМЕНЯЕМЫХ В СЕЙСМИЧЕСКИ АКТИВНЫХ РАЙОНАХ
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.22337/2587-9618-2025-21-2-187-199Ключевые слова:
метод конечных элементов, модальный анализ, сейсмическое воздействие, механическая безопасность, пустотообразователи, облегченные монолитные железобетонные перекрытияАннотация
В настоящей статье представлены разработанные авторами методики численного моделирования облегченных монолитных железобетонных перекрытий с пустотообразователями и сравнительный анализ различных подходов численного моделирования для зданий и сооружений, строящихся в сейсмически активных районах и имеющих в своём составе подобные облегчённые плиты перекрытий.
Библиографические ссылки
Dzhamuev B.K. The effect of non-removable void generators on the strength of monolithic reinforced concrete floor slabs clamped along the contour. Building and Reconstruction. 2024;(2):3-15. (In Russ.)
Tiwari N. and Zafar S. Structural Behavior of Bubble Deck Slabs and Its Application: Main Paper. IJSRD International Journal for Scientific Research & Development. 2016. Vol. 4. Issue 02. Pp: 433-437. ISSN (online): 2321-0613.
Ibrahim A. M., Ali N. K., and Salman W. D. Flexural Capacities of Reinforced Concrete Two-Way Bubbledeck Slabs of Plastic Spherical Voids. J. Print. Iraq. 2013. Vol. 06. No. 02. Pp: 9-20.
Valivonis J., Skuturna T, Daugeviius M. and Šneideris A. Punching shear strength of rein-forced concrete slabs with plastic void formers. Constr. Build. Mater. 2017. Vol.145. Pp: 518-527.
Saifulla M., Azeem M. A. Comparative Seismic Performance of a Conventional Slab and Flat Slab over a Bubble Deck Slab. International Journal of Emerging Technology and Advanced Engineering. November 2017. Vol. 7. Issue 11. Pp: 137-143.
Teja P. P., Kumar P. V, Mounika C. R., and Saha P. Structural Behavior of Bubble Deck Slab. January 2012. Pp: 383-388.
Lakshmikanth L., Poluraju P. Performance of Structural Behaviour of Bubble Deck Slab. In-ternational Journal of Recent Technology and Engineering (IJRTE). April 2019. Vol.7. Issue 6C2. ISSN: 2277-3878.
Varghese J. P, M. George. Parametric Investi-gation on the Seismic Response of Voided and Solid Flat Slab Systems. IJISET - International Journal of Innovative Science, Engineering & Technology. March 2018. Vol. 5. Issue 3. Pp: 256-258.
Mahalakshmi S., S. Nanthini S., and Saha A. P. Experimental Studies on Comparison of Conventional Slab and Bubble Deck Slab Based on Strength. 2017. Vol. 5. Pp: 580-588.
Orlova M.D., Mnushkin M.A., Evtushenko I.S., Vinogradova K.I., Egarmin K.A. Analy-sis of the use of hollow formers from recycled polypropylene in the creation of lightweight monolithic floors. Research of various directions of modern science: Collection of materials of the XXI International Scientific and practical Conference. Part 1. Moscow. 2017. Pp.562-567. (In Russ.)
Filimonova E. S. Analysis of the stress-strain state of a monolithic floor slab with void gener-ators according to the Cobiax system based on various computational models // J. Young Sci-entist. 2022. No. 20 (415). Pp. 107-109. (In Russ.)
. STO 35546020.001-2016 «Fixed formwork (voids and couplings) Sibforma ®. General in-formation about the technology, product range. Recommendations for the calculation and de-sign of monolithic girderless floor slabs with non-removable formwork Sibform ® in accord-ance with Code of Practice 63.13330.2012». (In Russ.)
STO 38311046-001-2019 «Monolithic rein-forced concrete lightweight slabs with Simkar void formers. Rules of design and construction». (In Russ.)
Recommendations for the calculation of mono-lithic beamless floor slabs with Simkar void-forming slabs (without prestressing)/National Research Moscow State University of Civil En-gineering, 2014. -119с.
Белостоцкий А.М., Дубинский С.И., Аул А.А., Нагибович А.И., Афанасьева И.Н., Козырев О.А., Павлов А.С. Verification re-port ANSYS Mechanical software (4 volume). – М.: National Research Moscow State University of Civil Engineering, Research & Development Centre StaDyO, 2009, 2024.
Code of Practice 63.13330.2018 “Concrete and reinforced concrete structures. General provi-sions”.
Structural Analysis Guide, Documentation for ANSYS, Release 21R2. 2021.
A. Belostotsky, A. Nagibovich, P. Novikov, V. Vershinin. EARTHQAUKE OF BUILDINGS AND STRUCTURES: REGULATORY «MUST-DO» OR SCIENTIFICALLY SUBSTANTIATED RESULTS // International Journal for Computa-tional Civil and Structural Engineering. – 2024. – Vol. 20, No. 4. – P. 241-252.
D. Dmitriev, P. Novikov, S. Petryashev, A. Nagibovich. CONSIDERATION OF THE SEISMIC IMPACT’S WAVE NATURE IN THE DESIGN JUSTIFICATION OF HIGH-RISE BUILDINGS SEISMIC RESISTANCE // International Journal for Computational Civil and Structural Engineering. – 2024. – Vol. 20, No. 3. – P. 198-205.
A. Belostotsky, A. Nagibovich, A. Pavlov. NUMERICAL SIMULATION OF THE STRESS-STRAIN STATE OF A LARGE-SPAN STRUCTURE WITH JOINTS WITH GAP UNDER THE SEISMIC LOADS IN A TRANSIENT DYNAMIC // International Jour-nal for Computational Civil and Structural En-gineering. – 2023. – Vol. 19, No. 3. – P. 165-172.
Malahova A.N. Pustotnye kessonnye plity perekrytij monolitnyh mnogoetazhnyh zdanij [Hollow coffered floor slabs of monolithic mul-ti-storey buildings] // J. Vestnik MGSU. 2016. No. 6. Pp. 15-24. (rus)
Загрузки
Опубликован
Выпуск
Раздел
Лицензия
Copyright (c) 2025 International Journal for Computational Civil and Structural Engineering
Это произведение доступно по лицензии Creative Commons «Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike» («Атрибуция — Некоммерческое использование — На тех же условиях») 4.0 Всемирная.
