ACOUSTIC EMISSION-BASED DAMAGE DETECTION IN STEEL FRAMED STRUCTURE- A REVIEW
Main Article Content
Abstract
Steel structures are commonly utilized in vast areas in industries, and also now a days they are used in residential settings as well. Structures made of steel is a better alternative as their constructions have high strength, light weight and quick compared to other construction materials. Steel structure degradation is frequently related to an engineering system's underperformance and leads to collapse. Therefore, it is essential to identify the problem and take remedial steps to make sure that structures function as intended throughout their design lives. Among the best non-destructive assessment methods for finding problems is acoustic emission (AE). The current study evaluates the available literature on this method in a few major areas and discusses historical advances in each category. The pros and cons of each approach are discussed, and future study directions are suggested. This review examines the fundamental Acoustic Emission techniques and contemporary research to identify damage in different types of steel structures using various localization approaches. This research aims to find the ideal placement for a real-time sensor to detect deterioration in a steel-framed construction. Finally, the artificial intelligence techniques used to identify deterioration in the steel frame construction are discussed.
Downloads
Article Details
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
References
Emission, Mark, F. Carlos-Acoustic. Heeding the Warning Sounds from Materials. ASTM Standardisation News. 2003.
Holford, K.M. and Lark, R.J. Acoustic emission testing of bridges, in Inspection and monitoring techniques for bridges and civil structures. G. Fu, Editor. 2005, Wood head Publishing Limited and CRC. P.183-215. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1533/9781845690953.183
Udwadia, Firdaus, E. Methodology for optimum sensor locations for parameter identification in dynamic systems. Journal of Engineering Mechanics. 1994, 120(2), p. 368-390. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9399(1994)120:2(368)
Shah, P.C., and Udwadia, F.E. A methodology for optimal sensor locations for identification of dynamic systems. 1978, p.188-196. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1115/1.3424225
Datta, A.K., Shrikhande, M., and Paul, D.K. On the optimal location of sensors in multi-storeyed buildings. Journal of earthquake engineering. 2002, 6(1), p. 17-30. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/13632460209350408
Li, Z.N., Tang, J., and Li, Q.S. Optimal sensor locations for structural vibration measurements. Applied Acoustics. 2004, 65(8), p.807-818 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apacoust.2003.12.007
Calabrese, L., Galeano, M., Proverbio, E. The use of b-value and Ib-value of acoustic emission in monitoring hydrogen-assisted cracking of martensitic stainless steel. Int. J. Micro struct. Mater. Prop. 2017, 12, p.165–182. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1504/IJMMP.2017.091099
Behnia, A., Chai, H.K., Shiotani, T. Advanced structural health monitoring of concrete structures with the aid of acoustic emission. Constr. Build. Mater. 2014, 65, p.282–302. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2014.04.103
Shiotani, T., Yuyama, S., Li, ZW., Ohtsu, M. Application of AE improved b-value to quantitative evaluation of fracture process in concrete materials. J. Acoust. Emiss. 2001, 19, p.118–133.
MISTRAS Group Inc. Express-8 AE System user's Manual, Rev 0, Part#: 7050-1000. Physical Acoustic Corporation, 2014
Hatano, H., Watanabe, T. Reciprocity calibration of acoustic emission transducers in Rayleigh wave and longitudinal wave sound field. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America. 1997, 101, p.1450-1455 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1121/1.418170
Hsu, N.N., Breckenridge, F.R. Characterization and calibration of acoustic emission sensors. Materials Evaluation. 1981, 39, p.60-68
Vallen Systeme GmbH. Acoustic Emission Sensors Specification; 2015. Available from: http://www.vallen.de/zdownload/pdf/sov1507.pdf [Accessed 2018-07-03]
Shehadeh M., Steel J.A., Reuben R.L. Acoustic emission source location for steel pipe and pipeline applications: the role of arrival time estimation. Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers Part E‐Journal of Process Mechanical Engineering. 2006, 220(E2), p.121‐133. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1243/095440806X78829
Shetty N., Livitsanos G., Van Hemelrijck D., Aggelis D.G., Wevers M., Verstrynge E. Characterization of mechanical behaviour of masonry under compression using acoustic emission. in 8th International Conference on Acoustic Emission Kyoto, Japan. 2016, p.365‐370
Shah S.P., Li Z. Localization of micro cracking in concrete under uniaxial tension. ACI Materials Journal. 1994, 91(4), p.372–381. DOI: https://doi.org/10.14359/4052
Grosse C.U., Reinhardt H.W., Dahm T. Localization and classification of fracture types in concrete with quantitative acoustic emission measurement techniques. NDT & E International. 1997, 30(4), p.223‐230 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0963-8695(96)00060-6
Rao, S.S., & Subramanian, B. Analysis of Acoustic Emission Signals using Wavelet Transformation Technique. Defense Science Journal. 2008, 58(4), p.559. DOI: https://doi.org/10.14429/dsj.58.1677
Ai, L., Greer, B., Hill, J., Soltangharaei, V., & Ziehl, R.A.P. Finite element modelling of acoustic emission in dry cask storage systems generated by cosine bell sources. In AIP Conference Proceedings. 2019, 2102(1), 130001. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1063/1.5099851
Kosnik, D.E., Hopwood, T., & Corr, D.J. Acoustic emission monitoring for assessment of steel bridge details. In AIP Conference Proceedings, 2011, 1335(1), 1410-1417. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1063/1.3592097
Amer, A.O., Gloanec, A.L., Courtin, S., & Touze, C. Characterization of fatigue damage in 304L steel by an acoustic emission method. Procedia Engineering. 2013, 66, p. 651-660. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.proeng.2013.12.117
Sivasuriyan, A., Vijayan, D.S., Górski, W., Wodzyński, Ł., Vaverková, M.D., & Koda, E. Practical implementation of structural health monitoring in multi-story buildings. Buildings. 2021, 11(6), p. 263 DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/buildings11060263
Colada, M., Prevorovsky, Z. Remote AE monitoring of fatigue crack growth in complex aircraft structures. In: Proceedings, 30th European Conference on Acoustic Emission Testing & 7th International Conference on Acoustic Emission, 2012, p. 12-15.
Di, Bo, Jingkai Wang, Haotian Li, Jinhang Zheng, Yu Zheng, and Gangbing Song. Investigation of bonding behaviour of FRP and steel bars in self-compacting concrete structures using acoustic emission method. Sensors. 2019, 19(1), 159. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/s19010159
Adamczak-Bugno, A., Swit, G., & Krampikowska, A. Application of the Acoustic Emission Method in the Assessment of the Technical Condition of Steel Structures. In IOP Conference Series: Materials Science and Engineering. 2019, 471(3), p. 032041. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1088/1757-899X/471/3/032041
Khan, M.T.I. Structural Health Monitoring by Acoustic Emission. Structural Health Monitoring from Sensing to Processing. 2018, 23. DOI: https://doi.org/10.5772/intechopen.79483
Verstrynge, E., Lacidogna, G., Accornero, F., & Tomor, A. A review on acoustic emission monitoring for damage detection in masonry structures. Construction and Building Materials. 2021, 268, 121089. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2020.121089
Ghiassi, B., Verstrynge, E., Lourenço, P.B., & Oliveira, D.V. Characterization of debonding in FRP-strengthened masonry using the acoustic emission technique. Engineering Structures. 2014, 66, p.24-34. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engstruct.2014.01.050
Świt, G. Acoustic emission method for locating and identifying active, destructive processes in operating facilities. Applied Sciences. 2018, 8(8), p.1295. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/app8081295
Black, C.J., & Ventura, C.E. Blind test on damage detection of a steel frame structure. In Society for Experimental Mechanics. Inc, 16 the International Modal Analysis Conference. 1998, 1, p. 623-629.
Bernagozzi, G., Ventura, C.E., Allahdadian, S., Kaya, Y., Landi, L., & Diotallevi, P.P. Application of modal flexibility-based deflections for damage diagnosis of a steel frame structure. Procedia Engineering. 2017, 199, p.2026-2033. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.proeng.2017.09.468
Döhler, M., & Hille, F. Subspace-based damage detection on steel frame structure under changing excitation. In Structural Health Monitoring. 2014, 5, p. 167-174. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-04570-2_19
Hou, Z., Noori, M.N., & St Amand, R. Wavelet-based approach for structural damage detection. Journal of Engineering Mechanics. 2000, 126(7), p.677. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9399(2000)126:7(677)
Das, A.K., Suthar, D., & Leung, C.K. Machine learning-based crack mode classification from unlabeled acoustic emission waveform features. Cement and Concrete Research. 2019, 121, p.42-57. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cemconres.2019.03.001
Azimi, M., Eslamlou, A.D., Pekcan, G. Data-Driven Structural Health Monitoring, and Damage Detection through Deep Learning: State-of-the-Art Review. Sensors. 2020, 20, p.2778. https://doi.org/10.3390/s20102778 DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/s20102778
Paulraj, M.P., Yaacob, S., Majid, M.A., Kazim, M.N.F.M., & Krishnan, P. Structural steel plate damage detection using non-destructive testing, frame energy-based statistical features, and artificial neural networks. Procedia Engineering. 2013, 53, p.376-386. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.proeng.2013.02.049
Betti, M., Facchini, L., & Biagini, P. Damage detection on a three-story steel frame using artificial neural networks and genetic algorithms. Meccanica, 2015, 50(3), p.875-886. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11012-014-0085-9