NUMERICAL MODELING OF CAST-IN-PLACE REINFORCED CONCRETE BUBBLE DECK FLOOR SLABS UTILIZED IN EARTHQUAKE-PRONE REGIONS. PART TWO
Main Article Content
Abstract
This article presents developed techniques for numerical modelling of lightweight cast-in-place reinforced concrete bubble deck floor slabs and a comparative analysis of different approaches to numerical modelling of buildings and structures with such lightweight floors, that are constructed in earthquake-prone regions.
Downloads
Article Details
Issue
Section
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
How to Cite
References
Belostotsky A., Nagibovich A., Scherbina S., Vasileva T. Numerical modeling of cast-in-place reinforced concrete bubble deck floor slabs utilized in earthquake-prone region // Int. J. Comput. Civil Struct. Eng. – 2025. – Vol. 21. – No. 2. – Pp. 187-199.
Dzhamuev B.K. The effect of non-removable void generators on the strength of monolithic reinforced concrete floor slabs clamped along the contour // Build-ing and Reconstruction. – 2024. – Vol. 2. Pp. 3-15. (In Russian)
Tiwari N., Zafar S. Structural behavior of bubble deck slabs and its application: Main paper // Int. J. Sci. Res. Dev. – 2016. – Vol. 4. – Iss. 02. – Pp. 433-437.
Ibrahim A.M., Ali N.K., Salman W.D. Flexural capacities of reinforced concrete two-way bubble deck slabs of plastic spherical voids // J. Print. Iraq. – 2013. – Vol. 06. – No. 02. – Pp: 9-20.
Valivonis J., Skuturna T, Daugeviius M., Šneideris A. Punching shear strength of reinforced concrete slabs with plastic void formers // Constr. Build. Mater. – 2017. – Vol.145. – Pp. 518-527.
Saifulla M., Azeem M.A. Comparative seismic performance of a conventional slab and flat slab over a bubble deck slab // Int. J. Emerg. Technol. Adv. Eng. – 2017. – Vol. 7. – Iss. 11. – Pp. 137-143.
Teja P.P., Kumar P.V, Mounika C.H., Saha P. Structural behavior of bubble deck slab / In: Proceedings of the IEEE-International Conference on Advances in Engineering, Science and Management, Nagapattinam, Tamil Nadu, India, 2012. – Pp: 383-388.
Lakshmikanth L., Poluraju P. Perfor-mance of structural behaviour of bubble deck slab // Int. J. Recent Technol. Eng. – 2019. – Vol.7. – Iss. 6C2. – Pp. 865-870.
Varghese J.P, George M. Parametric in-vestigation on the seismic response of voided and solid flat slab systems // Int. J. Innov. Sci. Eng. Technol. – 2018. – Vol. 5. – Iss. 3. – Pp 256-258.
Nagashree B, Shariff S., Kumar M. Ex-perimental studies on comparison of con-ventional slab and bubble deck slab based on strength // Int. J. Sci. Res. Dev. – 2017. – Vol. 5. – Iss. 3. – Pp: 1160-1162.
Orlova M.D., Mnushkin M.A., Evtu-shenko I.S., Vinogradova K.I., Egarmin K.A. Analysis of the use of hollow for-mers from recycled polypropylene in the creation of lightweight monolithic floors. Research of various directions of modern science: Collection of materials of the XXI International Scientific and practical Conference. Part 1. Moscow. 2017. Pp. 562-567. (In Russian)
Filimonova E.S. Analysis of the stress-strain state of a monolithic floor slab with void generators according to the Cobiax system based on various computational models // Young Scientist. – 2022. – No. 20 (415). – Pp. 107-109. (In Russian)
. STO 35546020.001-2016 «Fixed form-work (voids and couplings) Sibforma ®. General information about the technology, product range. Recommendations for the calculation and design of monolithic girderless floor slabs with non-removable formwork Sibform ® in accordance with Code of Practice 63.13330.2012». (In Russian)
STO 38311046-001-2019 «Monolithic reinforced concrete lightweight slabs with Simkar void formers. Rules of design and construction». (In Russian)
Recommendations for the calculation of monolithic beamless floor slabs with Simkar void-forming slabs (without pre-stressing) / National Research Moscow State University of Civil Engineering, 2014. –119 p.
Белостоцкий А.М., Дубинский С.И., Аул А.А., Нагибович А.И., Афанась-ева И.Н., Козырев О.А., Павлов А.С. Verification report ANSYS Mechanical software (4 volume). – М.: National Re-search Moscow State University of Civil Engineering, Research & Development Centre StaDyO, 2009, 2024.
Code of Practice 63.13330.2018 “Con-crete and reinforced concrete structures. General provisions”.
Structural Analysis Guide, Documentation for ANSYS, Release 21R2. 2021.
Belostotsky A., Nagibovich A., Novikov P., Vershinin V. Earthquake of buildings and structures: regulatory “must-do” or scientifically substantiated results // Int. J. Comput. Civil Struct. Eng. – 2024. – Vol. 20. – No. 4. – Pp. 241-252.
Dmitriev D., Novikov P., Petryashev S., Nagibovich A. Consideration of the seis-mic impact’s wave nature in the design justification of high-rise buildings seismic resistance // Int. J. Comput. Civil Struct. Eng. – 2024. – Vol. 20. – No. 3. – Pp. 198-205.
Belostotsky A., Nagibovich A., Pavlov A. Numerical simulation of the stress-strain state of a large-span structure with joints with gap under the seismic loads in a transient dynamic // Int. J. Comput. Civil Struct. Eng. – 2023. – Vol. 19. – No. 3. – Pp. 165-172.
Malahova A.N. Pustotnye kessonnye plity perekrytij monolitnyh mnogoetazhnyh zdanij [Hollow coffered floor slabs of monolithic multi-storey buildings] // Vestnik MGSU. – 2016. – No. 6. – Pp. 15-24. (In Russian)