COMPARATIVE STUDY OF EARTHQUAKE-RESISTANT BUILDING DESIGN STANDARDS
Main Article Content
Abstract
Earthquakes are often disasters that cause significant damage to infrastructure, buildings, and even fatalities. As a result, many nations globally have established earthquake-resistant design standards to protect infrastructure, buildings, and human lives from the impacts of seismic events. The objective of this research is to evaluate the impact of implementing earthquake-resistant construction standards on the structural integrity and performance of buildings throughout Indonesia. The research was undertaken by comparing buildings designed based on SNI 1726:2019, Eurocode 8:2004, and IS 1893:2016. The method employed involves comparing both elastic and inelastic design results using pushover analysis for each standard to assess seismic performance using ETABS software as an analytical tool. Findings from the analysis reveal that structures designed following the SNI 1726:2019 required the smallest area of flexural reinforcement, followed by an increased requirement in Eurocode 8:2004, and the highest in IS 1893:2016. Furthermore, the nonlinear pushover analysis revealed that the performance point of SNI 1726:2019 was 8.38% higher than Eurocode 8:2004 and 24.03% higher than IS 1893:2016 in the X direction, and 12.15% higher than Eurocode 8:2004 and 27.76% higher than IS 1893:2016 in the Y direction.
Downloads
Article Details
Issue
Section
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
How to Cite
References
Dhanvijay, V., Telang, D., & Nair, V. (2015). Comparative study of different codes in seismic assessment. International Research Journal of Engineering and Technology (IRJET), 2(4), 1371. https://www.irjet.net/archives/V2/i4/IRJET-V2I4062.
Santos, S. H., Giarlelis, C., Jara, J., Lampropoulos, A., Lo Presti, D., Montens, S., Sutcu, F., Takeuchi, T., Traikova, M., Varum, H., White, J., Zmigrodzki, S., Pinto, J., & Arai, A. (2020, May 20–22). Comparative study of international major codes for the seismic design of buildings. In Synergy of Culture and Civil Engineering – History and Challenges (IABSE Symposium).
Eirgash, M. A. (2019). A comparative study of seismic performance of the building designed using four major codes. International Journal of Engineering Research & Technology (IJERT), 8(8), Article 80180. http://www.ijert.org/ijertv8is080180
Kour, J., & Chand, J. (2021). Comparative study of seismic analysis of vertically irregular R.C. frame using Indian and Euro code. In IOP Conference Series: Earth and Environmental Science (Vol. 889, Article 012042). IOP Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1088/1755-1315/889/1/012042
Adhikari, D., Adhikari, S., & Thapa, D. (2022). A comparative study on seismic analysis of national building code of Nepal, India, Bangladesh and China. Open Access Library Journal, 9, e8933. https://doi.org/10.4236/oalib.1108933
Aksoylu, C., Mobark, A., Arslan, M. H., & Erkan, İ. H. (2020). A comparative study on ASCE 7-16, TBEC-2018 and TEC-2007 for reinforced concrete buildings. Research on Design and Construction, 19(2), 282–[halaman akhir jika diketahui]. https://doi.org/10.7764/RDLC.19.2.282
Srikanth, B., & Ramesh, V. (2013). Comparative study of seismic response for seismic coefficient and response spectrum methods. International Journal of Engineering Research and Applications, 3(5), 1919–1924. http://www.ijera.com
Karthiga, S., Titus, H. E., Hazarika, R. R., & Harrish, M. (2015). Design and comparison of a residential building (G+10) for seismic forces using the codes: IS1893, Euro code 8, ASCE 7-10 and British code. International Journal of Research in Engineering and Technology (IJRET), 4(6), 205. http://www.ijret.org
Karthiga, S., Titus, H. E., Hazarika, R. R., & Harrish, M. (2015). Design and comparison of a residential building (G+10) for seismic forces using the codes: IS1893, Euro code 8, ASCE 7-10 and British code. International Journal of Research in Engineering and Technology (IJRET), 4(6), 205. http://www.ijret.org
Malla, S., Alagirisamy, M., Dangol, P., & Giri, O. P. (2024). Comparative analysis of an apartment building using seismic codes NBC 105:1994 and NBC 105:2020 (A case study). [Nama Jurnal jika ada]. https://doi.org/10.48084/.7858
İsık, E., Hadzima-Nyarko, M., Bilgin, H., Ademović, N., Büyüksaraç, A., Harirchian, E., Bulajić, B., Özmen, H. B., & Aghakouchaki Hosseini, S. E. (2022). A comparative study of the effects of earthquakes in different countries on target displacement in mid-rise regular RC structures. Applied Sciences, 12(23), 12495.https://doi.org/10.3390/app122312495
Rajeev, A., Meena, N. K., & Pallav, K. (2019). Comparative study of seismic design and performance of OMRF building using Indian, British, and European codes. Infrastructures, 4(4), 71. https://doi.org/10.3390/infrastructures4040071
Salim, J. T., & Sidi, I. D. (2024). Comparative seismic evaluation of building codes: A case study on structural performance and safety. Journal of Engineering and Technological Sciences, 56(6), 793–807. https://doi.org/10.5614/j.eng.technol.sci.2024.56.6.10
Tapkire, P. P., & Birajdar, S. J. (2015). Comparative study of high rise building using Indian standards and Euro standards under seismic forces. International Journal of Science and Research (IJSR), 4(7). http://www.ijsr.net
Suliman, M., & Lu, L. (2024). A comparative study of seismic performance evaluation of reinforced concrete frame structures using Chinese and African seismic codes. Advances in Civil Engineering, 2024, Article ID 5588833, 18 pages. https://doi.org/10.1155/2024/5588833
Ramteke, S., Gaikwad, S. A., Khatkale, A. A., Pawar, R. M., & Temak, R. S. (2024). Comparative study of earthquake resistant buildings using STAAD-Pro software. International Journal of Innovative Research in Technology (IJIRT), 10(12). https://www.ijirt.org/paper_details.php?id=164773
Pragnya, C., Kumar, M. S., Raju, K. H. V., Raju, K. L., Krishna, K., & Bharathi, K. P. (2021). Comparative study of earthquake resistant design techniques on multistorey building. International Journal for Advanced Research in Science & Technology, 11(8). http://www.ijarst.in
Computers and Structures, Inc. (2022). ETABS (Version 20) [Computer software]. CSI Inc. https://www.csiamerica.com/products/etabs
Badan Standardisasi Nasional. (2019). Procedures for seismic resistance design for building and non-building structures (SNI 1726:2019). Badan Standardisasi Nasional.
European Committee for Standardization. (2004). Eurocode 8: Design of structures for earthquake resistance – Part 1: General rules, seismic actions and rules for buildings (EN 1998-1:2004). European Committee for Standardization.
Bureau of Indian Standards. (2016). IS 1893 Part 1: Indian standard criteria for earthquake resistant design of structures. Bureau of Indian Standards.
Akman, B. G., & Seçer, M. (2025). Pushover analysis of a reinforced concrete frame and calculation of CO₂ emissions. International Journal of Advanced Natural Science and Engineering Research, 9(2), 319–326.
Soetjipto, J. W., Nurmalia, I. E., & Krisnamurti. (2024). Integrating push-over analysis and FEMA guidelines for building vulnerability assessment. Research on Engineering Structures and Materials, 10(2), 691–709. https://doi.org/10.17515/resm2023.56st1024rs
Kurniati, D., & Loko, P. B. (2020). Pushover study analysis of PGRI Faculty of Engineering building. International Journal of Engineering, Technology and Natural Sciences, 2(1).
Doodala, S., Jaswanth, P., Nagendra, T., Khan, P. N., & Kumar, A. A. (2024). Pushover analysis of G+14 story building by using ETABS software. International Journal of Research in Engineering, IT and Social Sciences, 14(6), 434–446.